-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-00:04 Security Advisory FreeBSD, Inc. Topic: Delegate port contains numerous buffer overflows Category: ports Module: delegate Announced: 2000-02-19 Affects: Ports collection before the correction date. Corrected: 2000-02-02 FreeBSD only: NO I. Background An optional third-party port distributed with FreeBSD contains numerous remotely-exploitable buffer overflows which allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the local system, typically as the 'nobody' user. II. Problem Description Delegate is a versatile application-level proxy. Unfortunately it is written in a very insecure style, with potentially dozens of different exploitable buffer overflows (including several demonstrated ones), each of which could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the delegate server. This code will run as the user ID of the 'delegated' process, typically 'nobody' in the recommended configuration, but this still represents a security risk as the attacker may be able to mount a local attack to further upgrade his or her access privileges. Note that the delegate utility is not installed by default, nor is it "part of FreeBSD" as such: it is part of the FreeBSD ports collection, which contains over 3100 third-party applications in a ready-to-install format. FreeBSD makes no claim about the security of these third-party applications, although an effort is underway to provide a security audit of the most security-critical ports. III. Impact If you have not chosen to install the delegate port/package, then your system is not vulnerable. If you have, then local or remote users who can connect to the delegate port(s), or malicious servers which a user accesses using the delegate proxy, can potentially execute arbitrary code on your system in any number of ways. IV. Workaround Remove the delegate port/package, if you have installed it. V. Solution Unfortunately no simple fix is available - the problems with the delegate software are too endemic to be fixed by a simple patch. It is hoped the software authors will take security to heart and correct the security problems in a future version, although user caution is advised given the current state of the code. Depending on your local setup and your security threat model, using a firewall/packet filter such as ipfw(8) or ipf(8) to prevent remote users from connecting to the delegate port(s) may be enough to meet your security needs. Note that this will not prevent legitimate proxy users from attacking the delegate server, although this may not be an issue if they have a shell account on the machine anyway. Note also that this does not prevent "passive" exploits in which a user is convinced through other means into visiting a malicious server using the proxy, which may be able to compromise it by sending back invalid data. Several flaws of this type have been discovered during a brief survey of the code. If you are running FreeBSD 4.0, a possible solution might be to confine the delegate process inside a "jail" (see the jail(8) manpage). A properly configured jail will isolate the contents in their own separate "virtual machine", which can be suitably secured so that an attacker who gains control of a process running inside the jail cannot escape and gain access to the rest of the machine. Note that this is different from a traditional chroot(8), since it does not just attempt to isolate processes inside portions of the filesystem. This solution is not possible under standard FreeBSD 3.x or earlier. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBOK+NTVUuHi5z0oilAQGGnAP+NOxAOVpEUpyR0iQwNjA1Je7B4M5gOxzc NwqQKp7WBm/IzzIW23KvyPcbTld83+m2tnhdNW3srh8ESSYDaa/hhmG2AtR0LYEL H2EWTIBcPBhidquX+ihKGTSaMnMjYpmp6GVGSsBqcNFXAPGHiJ6BbsEg2k6rJSLz wgL0NJ+qkCI= =ZhXO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----